<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donlegere.com/2009/10/marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donlegere.com/2009/10/marketing/</link>
	<description>Abundance, Personal Wealth and Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:41:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://donlegere.com/2009/10/marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donlegere.com/?p=107#comment-36</guid>
		<description>When one really digs deep, you begin to understand the true and perhaps unethical perspective of the whole Walmart approach.  How interesting to see the irresponsible dynamic of the whole Walmart enterprise as it relates to their desire to succceed and damn the side effects. 

I find that not only is Walmart irreponsible in its approach to the North American worker, but Walmart has no problem with &#039;beating up&#039; its suppliers on lowering their wholesale prices in exchange for the privilege of putting out their products on the Walmart shelves; and there then is more.

Some people aren&#039;t aware that there are property owners who do not even receive any monetary remunerations for the use of their land from Walmart.  This is because Walmart sometimes structures development deals that promote that their presence in a shopping center will attract other high paying tenants who will reward the owner so that Walmart doesn&#039;t need to contribute their monies (only their presence)...how arrogant is that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When one really digs deep, you begin to understand the true and perhaps unethical perspective of the whole Walmart approach.  How interesting to see the irresponsible dynamic of the whole Walmart enterprise as it relates to their desire to succceed and damn the side effects. </p>
<p>I find that not only is Walmart irreponsible in its approach to the North American worker, but Walmart has no problem with &#8216;beating up&#8217; its suppliers on lowering their wholesale prices in exchange for the privilege of putting out their products on the Walmart shelves; and there then is more.</p>
<p>Some people aren&#8217;t aware that there are property owners who do not even receive any monetary remunerations for the use of their land from Walmart.  This is because Walmart sometimes structures development deals that promote that their presence in a shopping center will attract other high paying tenants who will reward the owner so that Walmart doesn&#8217;t need to contribute their monies (only their presence)&#8230;how arrogant is that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

